|
Our Organization
Home
About Us
Calendar of Events
Contact Us
Our Mission
Photo Gallery
Resources
Obituaries
Online Videos
===========

The White House
==========
African Groups-Texas
African Executive
African Program-UTA
African Girls Assoc.
Asaba Progressive
Congolese Community
Council of Ghanaian
Ethiopian Women
Gambian Texas Assoc
Guinean Association
Igbo Community
Liberian Community
Nigerian Web Radio
Sisters of Sierra Leone
Tanzanian Community
Other Important Links
Mandingo-EU
Mandingo-USA
Mandingo Nations
Other Liberian Sites
Online News Sites
Online Network Sites
SMDF
--------------------------
Site Archives
-----------------------
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
|
|
LIBERIA: Education and
the Poverty Reduction Strategy
Francis W. Nyepon
January 8, 2010
Poverty is a severe injustice and an abuse of human
rights, especially for children. Liberia has had seven
years of peace, yet educational policies have had no
meaningful impact on learning, or on reducing poverty
for the average Liberian, most especially the children.
This author believes that education is pivotal in
breaking the vicious cycle of poverty in Liberia and
especially the social exclusion that is the reality for
many children. The author is convinced that the role of
education in our society must be one of achieving
universal primary education and adult literacy. These
twin areas of human development must become central to
the Sirleaf administration’s Poverty Reduction Strategy
(PRS) because it is at these levels of education through
which most poor children and poor adult pass, and within
which their achievements can assist them break the cycle
of poverty. Children's education and adult literacy are
critical to long-lasting peace, stability and
modernization of our country. Over two-thirds of the
population lives in poverty on less than US$1 a day,
with life expectancy still standing at just 45.
In most regions of Liberia, thousands of children do not
attend school. With one of the largest budgetary outlay
in government, the Ministry of Education (MOE) has had
little or no impact on the daily lives of children and
their families over the past 5 years. Furthermore, the
MOE national policies agenda haven’t provided an
environment for productive learning and career building.
Instead, policies have penalized innocent children as a
result of the lack of leadership and clear-cut direction
at the MOE. With the Sirleaf administration aim of
reaching universal primary education by 2015 – one of
the Millennium Development Goals (MGGs), it’s roadmap to
national recovery and sustainable development through
the PRS, is in serious jeopardy of collapse especially
in areas like education, health, sanitation, nutrition,
and water where children are impacted most.
National Education Policies have yet to provide children
and their families with opportunities to improve living
conditions and livelihood. Families and educators says
the national educational system face a number of
challenges, which includes severe impediments to
construction and rehabilitation of schools, even though
the MOE claims it has build and renovated several
thousand school buildings around the country, which no
one can see. Many public schools are overcrowded, and in
equally poor condition without adequate equipment,
supplies and educational materials. Village and district
leaders says their areas lack sufficient classroom space
to cope with population growth and density, which many
acknowledge forces students to sit on the ground or on
pieces of lumber, with teachers rarely having desks,
chairs or instructional materials.
The MOE must now initiate and provide a more proactive
and aggressive education agenda to improve
infrastructure, instructions, training and programs for
children and provide adequate equipment, and supplies to
schools across the country. Also, the MOE offers must
offer professional development training for teachers’
national wide. Its teacher training program is not
effective. Over half of the teachers in Liberia are not
qualified to teach the specific subject matter they now
teach. Yet the MOE offers no testing of teachers and has
no yardstick by which to measure performance across the
country. This author believes that one of the biggest
challenges that teachers and career educators at the MOE
have with the current education plan is mitigating the
negative impact that current learning conditions
superimposes on students and their families.
The Sirleaf administration is yet to establish an office
for planning and monitoring poverty reduction policies
and programs, which appear to be the reason why there
are so many gaps in orientation, implementation, and
follow-up of the PRS, thereby lack the kind of
breakthroughs made by the administration, which the
average person can comprehend. This author wishes to
suggest that the Sirleaf administration should align the
country’s social sector development with macro-economic
policies and strategies; thereby, linking debt-relief
and human development to the PRS. What the author is
suggesting here is that the Sirleaf administration
should broaden the utilization of its debt relief
policies and channel much needed resources to the
education and health sectors. In the context of
macroeconomic programs, special attention needs to be
paid to breaking the poverty cycle for children. The MOE
should adopt systemic changes to enhance and ensure good
quality education for children and robust learning for
adults.
Throughout Liberia, poverty is both a cause and effect
of insufficient access to or completion of education.
All over the country, children are less likely to enroll
in and complete school due to associated costs of
attending school, even when school is so-called ‘Free’.
The cost of uniform, fees, supplies, lunch, distance to
school, and transportation are in many cases beyond the
means of many families especially those at the bottom of
the social strata. This means that choices have to be
made, and the choice that is often made is to take a
child or several children out of school. This is the
harsh reality on the ground especially amongst families
stranded and stuck with this dilemma on a daily basis.
Also, rampant poverty is forcing thousands of rural and
peri-urban families to send their children to the city
to beg or sell on the streets, wash cars, push
wheelbarrow transport or toil in markets at the expense
of their education. Nearly half of children in rural
areas of Liberia have no access to basic education,
according to UNICEF.
Additionally, as children who are enrolled in school
grow older, the opportunity cost (their labor and the
foregone income it may entail) becomes greater, thus
increasing the likelihood of families forcing their
children to abandoning school. This author’s visit to
both urban and rural schools throughout the country
presented an immediate overview and evidence of children
dropping out of school to support themselves or to
supplement strained family income. In most cases,
children simply moved out of their homes to make life by
any means necessary. This is usually the norm for many
children in rural and peri-urban communities. In rural
areas for instance, many young men simply forget about
school altogether and take on a wife or two to sustain
life. In almost all cases, the lack of basic education
virtually guarantees perpetuation of the poverty cycle.
It further traps many well intentioned families to the
bottom of the social ladder because their income-earning
potential is reduced, not to mention the potential
productivity level of the country, or the receptivity to
change or transformation of the country, and the burning
desire of many to improve the quality of their lives.
This author therefore concludes that the lack of
education perpetuates poverty throughout Liberian
society, and poverty constrains access to schooling,
thereby suffocating painstaking progress and gains made
by the Sirleaf administration’s Poverty Reduction
Strategy. Notwithstanding, in order for the PRS to work
successfully and bring meaning to the lives of ordinary
people, poverty must be greatly reduced to touch the
lives of children and their families. But, this would
require strengthening and improving the livelihood of
families through employment, training and the provision
of basic services, productive skill sets, and not
necessarily through academic education. For example, a
25 year old individual does not need to sit in a fifth
grade classroom with 9 year old kids to lean verb
conjugations or introduction to basic algebra. He or she
could make better use of his or her time by gaining
productive life-saving skill sets and vocations to
improve the quality of his or her life.
This author is attempting to draw a distinction between
the complex and often very necessary role education
plays in the upward mobility of improving one’s life
vis-ŕ-vis poverty reduction and social development. For
instance, for many school-age children in Liberia,
education and learning can become a tool for preparing
them to take their rightful place in the society.
Therefore, if the PRS is to become successful, then the
Sirleaf administration must first work towards
eradicating poverty through education. This means
improving basic skill sets, through apprenticeship
training, vocational education, and targeted career
development programs. This also means teaching social
skills and etiquettes, promoting proper hygiene
practices and improving sanitation, and teaching
environmental health as a requirement to entering the
workplace, employment, and school.
This author believes that this view of education and
trend of thought would empower both school-age children
and school-going adults by opening avenues in
communication that would otherwise be closed. These
avenues would include expanding personal choices and
control over one’s environment, and provide the basis
for acquiring many other life skills like obtaining
access to information through print as well as
electronic media; equipping themselves with work and
family responsibilities; and changing the image they
have about themselves. Through this kind of innovation,
this author see education strengthening the
self-confidence of both school-age children and
school-going adults to actively and objectively
participate in their respective community and maybe
national affairs in order to ‘constructively’ influence
social, political, economic and environmental issues not
so much as becoming politicians, but being productive
ordinary citizens that seeks to enhance their lives and
bringing meaning to their communities.
About The Author: Francis Nyepon is Country Director of
the Wes African Children Support Network (WACSN) and
managing partner of DUCOR Waste Management in Liberia.
He is a policy analyst and Vice Chair of the Center for
Security and Development Studies, and serves on several
boards of humanitarian, environmental and human rights
organizations in the United States and Liberia. He can
be reached at fnyepon@Gmail.com
|
Barrack Obama Takes
Oath

Windows 7 Launched

Sanniquellie Mosque Project

Enter the Project Center
|
OK International is
currently offering a special one way & round trip fare
from JFK to Liberia and from Liberia to all U.S.
destinations

Contact our travel consultants @
718-206-4982 or 917-251-8343. Contact O. Kamara @
212- 882-1050 for group travel.
|

Researchers Crack WPA Encryption

Check out UTD Alumni Site

Alhaji G.V. Kromah
|